Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Ambulatory Disability

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 495,002,853 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,694,852 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.10%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary

Measurement	Indian (Asian)	Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Minimum	0.51%	0.94%
Maximum	12.9%	13.0%
Range	12.4%	12.1%
Mean	5.2%	5.2%
Median	5.1%	5.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.4%	4.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.6%	6.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	1.2%	2.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	1.3%	1.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	1.3%	1.8%

Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Ambulatory Disability

In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.49%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Ambulatory Disability
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 5.1%
Iranians	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 5.1%
Yup'ik	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Korea	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 5.2%
Okinawans	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 5.3%
Burmese	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 5.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 5.3%
Immigrants \| China	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 5.3%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 5.3%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 5.4%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 5.4%
Indians (Asian)	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 5.4%
Ethiopians	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 5.4%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 5.4%
Immigrants \| Israel	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 5.4%
Tongans	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 5.4%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 5.4%
Zimbabweans	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 5.4%
Immigrants \| Nepal	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 5.4%
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 5.4%
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 5.4%