Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Korea Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Immigrants from Korea
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Immigrants from Korea
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Korea Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 495,002,853 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 416,118,040 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 2.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Immigrants from Korea |
Minimum | 0.51% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 12.9% | 24.1% |
Range | 12.4% | 23.0% |
Mean | 5.2% | 5.3% |
Median | 5.1% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 5.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Immigrants from Korea by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Korea are Okinawan (5.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Burmese (5.3%, a difference of 0.81%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.96%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and Yup'ik (5.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |