Afghan vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Afghan
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Afghans
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,854,459 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,694,852 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Afghan | Immigrants from Sri Lanka |
Minimum | 0.43% | 0.94% |
Maximum | 9.8% | 13.0% |
Range | 9.3% | 12.1% |
Mean | 5.5% | 5.2% |
Median | 5.3% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 6.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Afghans and Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Pakistan (5.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Australia (5.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Venezuela (5.4%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |