Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs South African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
South African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
South Africans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
69.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
24.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs South African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,316,169 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.253 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,558,615 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 4.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | South African |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.31% |
Maximum | 4.4% | 27.3% |
Range | 2.7% | 27.0% |
Mean | 3.0% | 5.7% |
Median | 2.9% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 5.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.60% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.56% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.56% | 6.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Australia (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Spanish American Indian (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Europe (3.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Macedonian (3.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Korean (3.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (3.1%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Blacks/African Americans | 34.7 /100 | #187 | Fair 3.0% |
Mexican American Indians | 34.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 3.0% |
Africans | 32.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 28.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 3.1% |
Koreans | 27.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 3.1% |
Macedonians | 27.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 3.1% |
South Africans | 24.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 3.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 24.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |