Immigrants from Lithuania vs Chilean Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Chilean
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Chileans
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Chilean Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,713,012 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.068 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,632,151 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 1.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Chilean |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 9.5% | 13.0% |
| Range | 5.9% | 10.9% |
| Mean | 5.6% | 6.3% |
| Median | 5.6% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Chileans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Belgium (5.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Spain (5.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Laotian (5.7%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Somali (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Sudanese (5.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from South Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |