Immigrants from Lithuania vs Choctaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Choctaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Choctaw
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Choctaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,714,489 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,646,224 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 55.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 5.7% | 22.4% |
| Range | 3.5% | 20.4% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 7.8% |
| Median | 3.2% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.78% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.86% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.85% | 3.1% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 1.5%), Chickasaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Navajo (4.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 5.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 5.3% |