Immigrants from Peru vs Choctaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Peru
Choctaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Peru
Choctaw
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Peru vs Choctaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,787,058 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,646,224 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 68.8%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Peru | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 0.24% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 13.2% | 22.4% |
| Range | 13.0% | 20.4% |
| Mean | 2.7% | 7.8% |
| Median | 2.5% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.85% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 3.1% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Peru by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Peru are Immigrants from Eritrea (2.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Egypt (2.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (2.7%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Colombia (2.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and Indian (Asian) (2.7%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Jamaicans | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Ethiopians | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 1.5%), Chickasaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Navajo (4.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 5.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 5.3% |