Immigrants from Lithuania vs Sudanese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Sudanese
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Sudanese
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
72.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Sudanese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,714,489 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,125,850 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.11%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Sudanese |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 0.77% |
| Maximum | 5.7% | 6.7% |
| Range | 3.5% | 5.9% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 3.2% |
| Median | 3.2% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.78% | 0.92% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.86% | 0.97% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.85% | 0.96% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Sudanese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |