Immigrants from Hungary vs New Zealander Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hungary
New Zealander
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Hungary
New Zealanders
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
12.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
6.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hungary vs New Zealander Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,680,611 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.934 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,920,080 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.349 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 1.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hungary | New Zealander |
Minimum | 0.15% | 0.53% |
Maximum | 32.0% | 14.1% |
Range | 31.9% | 13.6% |
Mean | 4.9% | 4.3% |
Median | 3.8% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 5.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hungary and New Zealanders by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are Immigrants from Latvia (3.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Cape Verdean (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Romanian (3.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Pakistani (3.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Iraq (3.1%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Oceania (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |