Indonesian vs Bangladeshi Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Indonesian
Bangladeshi
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Indonesians
Bangladeshis
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
9.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
14.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indonesian vs Bangladeshi Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,682,177 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indonesians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,368,014 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.53%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Indonesian | Bangladeshi |
| Minimum | 0.59% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 10.8% | 15.6% |
| Range | 10.2% | 12.2% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 7.0% |
| Median | 6.2% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Indonesians and Bangladeshis by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Indonesians are Immigrants from Albania (6.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Hungarian (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), German Russian (6.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Guamanian/Chamorro (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Alsatian (6.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
| German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |