Immigrants from Hungary vs Cape Verdean Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hungary
Cape Verdean
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Hungary
Cape Verdeans
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
12.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
12.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hungary vs Cape Verdean Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,680,611 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.934 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,552,896 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.610 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 0.050%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hungary | Cape Verdean |
| Minimum | 0.15% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 32.0% | 14.5% |
| Range | 31.9% | 13.2% |
| Mean | 4.9% | 3.8% |
| Median | 3.8% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hungary and Cape Verdeans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are Immigrants from Latvia (3.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Romanian (3.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Pakistani (3.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Iraq (3.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and Hispanic or Latino (3.1%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Romanian (3.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latvia (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Pakistani (3.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Iraq (3.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Hispanic or Latino (3.1%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
| Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |