Immigrants from France vs Czechoslovakian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from France
Czechoslovakian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from France
Czechoslovakians
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
21.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from France vs Czechoslovakian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 287,766,999 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,413,881 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 9.3%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from France | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 0.28% | 0.51% |
Maximum | 3.5% | 39.0% |
Range | 3.2% | 38.5% |
Mean | 1.9% | 4.3% |
Median | 1.8% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.96% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.85% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.83% | 6.2% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from France by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from France are Immigrants from Northern Europe (2.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (2.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eritrea (2.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.0%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Maltese | 98.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Russians | 98.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | France | 98.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Palestinians | 98.3 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Paraguayans | 98.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from El Salvador (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Grenada (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants (2.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Canadians | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.2% |
Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |