Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Czechoslovakian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Czechoslovakian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Czechoslovakians
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
97.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
21.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Czechoslovakian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 354,920,232 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,413,881 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 7.9%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 0.61% | 0.51% |
Maximum | 5.6% | 39.0% |
Range | 5.0% | 38.5% |
Mean | 2.0% | 4.3% |
Median | 2.0% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.2% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.55% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.73% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.73% | 6.2% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa are Norwegian (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Switzerland (2.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Moldova (2.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Chinese (2.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (2.1%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 97.5 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Chinese | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 97.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Norwegians | 97.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 96.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 96.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Syria | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 96.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 96.0 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Australians | 95.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Romanians | 95.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from El Salvador (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Grenada (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants (2.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Canadians | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.2% |
Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |