Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Czechoslovakian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Czechoslovakian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Czechoslovakians
1.8%
VISION DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
21.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Czechoslovakian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 499,136,938 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 1.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,413,881 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 20.7%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Asia | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 0.68% | 0.51% |
Maximum | 5.9% | 39.0% |
Range | 5.2% | 38.5% |
Mean | 1.7% | 4.3% |
Median | 1.6% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.8% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.40% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.65% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.65% | 6.2% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia are Immigrants from Korea (1.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from China (1.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Israel (1.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Bolivia (1.8%, a difference of 0.57%), and Indian (Asian) (1.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from El Salvador (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Grenada (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants (2.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Canadians | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.2% |
Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |