Uruguayan vs Immigrants from Morocco Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Immigrants from Morocco
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Uruguayans
Immigrants from Morocco
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Immigrants from Morocco Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,780,979 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,910,370 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.050%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Uruguayan | Immigrants from Morocco |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 23.8% | 12.4% |
| Range | 20.9% | 11.1% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 5.8% |
| Median | 5.9% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans and Immigrants from Morocco by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Morocco are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.080%), New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Romania (5.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |