Cypriot vs Zimbabwean Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Cypriot
Zimbabwean
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Cypriots
Zimbabweans
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cypriot vs Zimbabwean Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,870,126 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,187,176 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.539 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cypriot | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 0.38% | 0.83% |
| Maximum | 12.7% | 17.3% |
| Range | 12.3% | 16.5% |
| Mean | 5.3% | 5.5% |
| Median | 5.1% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Cypriots and Zimbabweans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Turkish (5.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |