Cypriot vs Immigrants from Malaysia Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Cypriot
Immigrants from Malaysia
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Cypriots
Immigrants from Malaysia
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cypriot vs Immigrants from Malaysia Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,870,126 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,959,775 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 0.020%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cypriot | Immigrants from Malaysia |
Minimum | 0.38% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 12.7% | 14.4% |
Range | 12.3% | 13.3% |
Mean | 5.3% | 5.6% |
Median | 5.1% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 6.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Cypriots and Immigrants from Malaysia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Turkish (5.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (5.5%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Turkish (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (5.5%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.6% |