Paraguayan vs Zimbabwean Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Paraguayan
Zimbabwean
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Paraguayans
Zimbabweans
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Paraguayan vs Zimbabwean Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,109,897 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Paraguayans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,187,176 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.539 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 2.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Paraguayan | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 0.94% | 0.83% |
Maximum | 14.7% | 17.3% |
Range | 13.8% | 16.5% |
Mean | 5.4% | 5.5% |
Median | 5.2% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 6.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Paraguayans and Zimbabweans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Paraguayans are Immigrants from Indonesia (5.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Argentinean (5.5%, a difference of 0.54%), Mongolian (5.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Venezuelan (5.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Cambodian (5.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Iran (5.4%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |