Chinese vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Chinese
Pima
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Chinese
Pima
10.3%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188 and weighted average of 10.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,540,994 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 56.8%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Pima |
| Minimum | 4.2% | 8.6% |
| Maximum | 33.9% | 44.5% |
| Range | 29.7% | 35.9% |
| Mean | 12.1% | 19.9% |
| Median | 10.8% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 25.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 8.2% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Italy (10.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Denmark (10.3%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Uruguayans | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Chinese | 98.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 98.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Palestinians | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |