Iranian vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Iranian
Pima
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Iranians
Pima
8.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,627,091 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Iranians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,540,994 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 86.3%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iranian | Pima |
Minimum | 1.1% | 8.6% |
Maximum | 25.0% | 44.5% |
Range | 23.9% | 35.9% |
Mean | 6.8% | 19.9% |
Median | 6.0% | 18.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 25.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 8.2% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Iranians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from China (8.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Israel (8.6%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Bolivia (8.7%, a difference of 0.70%), Thai (8.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (8.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |