Chinese vs Macedonian Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Chinese
Macedonian
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Chinese
Macedonians
10.3%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
97.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Macedonian Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188 and weighted average of 10.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,601,587 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.148 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 1.1%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Macedonian |
Minimum | 4.2% | 0.93% |
Maximum | 33.9% | 19.9% |
Range | 29.7% | 19.0% |
Mean | 12.1% | 10.1% |
Median | 10.8% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 12.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Macedonians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Italy (10.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Denmark (10.3%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Austria (10.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Hungary (10.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Ukraine (10.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Western Asia (10.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Philippines (10.4%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chinese | 98.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 98.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Palestinians | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 97.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Austria | 97.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Macedonians | 97.8 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 97.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Zimbabweans | 97.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Ethiopians | 97.4 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 97.2 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.5% |