Chinese vs Danish Male Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
Danish
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Chinese
Danes
12.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
MALE DISABILITY
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Danish Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,721 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 474,081,155 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.716 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 1.1%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Danish |
Minimum | 1.3% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 31.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 30.7% | 98.4% |
Mean | 13.4% | 23.2% |
Median | 12.4% | 14.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.1% | 11.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 18.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 24.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 24.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Danes by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are British (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Slovene (12.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Guamanian/Chamorro (12.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Swiss (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and European (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Immigrants from Liberia (11.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Laos (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Samoan (11.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Northern European (11.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Bahamian (11.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Czechs | 1.1 /100 | #240 | Tragic 11.9% |
Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 11.9% |
Northern Europeans | 1.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 11.9% |
Samoans | 1.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 11.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.0 /100 | #244 | Tragic 11.9% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 1.0 /100 | #245 | Tragic 11.9% |
Danes | 0.9 /100 | #246 | Tragic 11.9% |
Hungarians | 0.8 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.0% |
Poles | 0.7 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.0% |
German Russians | 0.5 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.0% |
Slovenes | 0.5 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 0.5 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.0% |
British | 0.4 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.1% |
Chinese | 0.4 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.1% |
Swiss | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.1% |
Europeans | 0.3 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.1% |
Basques | 0.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
Belgians | 0.3 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |
Swedes | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.1% |