Chinese vs Danish Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
COMPARE
Chinese
Danish
Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Comparison
Chinese
Danes
9.4%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 20 TO 24 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.3%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 20 TO 24 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Danish Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,258,935 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.119 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 447,112,661 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.330 and weighted average of 9.3%, a difference of 0.96%.
Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Danish |
Minimum | 1.8% | 4.5% |
Maximum | 22.3% | 69.4% |
Range | 20.5% | 64.9% |
Mean | 9.6% | 16.6% |
Median | 8.5% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 23.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 11.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Danes by Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Hmong (9.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Osage (9.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Tongan (9.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Nepal (9.4%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Immigrants from Sudan (9.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Slovene (9.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Czech (9.3%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Congo (9.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and Cuban (9.2%, a difference of 0.65%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Somalis | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.5% |