Chinese vs Yugoslavian Male Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
Yugoslavian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Chinese
Yugoslavians
12.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
MALE DISABILITY
1.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Yugoslavian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,721 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,684,891 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 1.4%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 4.2% |
| Maximum | 31.9% | 48.9% |
| Range | 30.7% | 44.8% |
| Mean | 13.4% | 15.7% |
| Median | 12.4% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.1% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Yugoslavians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are British (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Slovene (12.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Guamanian/Chamorro (12.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Swiss (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and German Russian (12.0%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Italian (11.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Carpatho Rusyn (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), U.S. Virgin Islander (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Bahamian (11.9%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 1.3 /100 | #236 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 1.3 /100 | #237 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Yugoslavians | 1.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Italians | 1.2 /100 | #239 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Czechs | 1.1 /100 | #240 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 1.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Samoans | 1.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 1.0 /100 | #244 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 1.0 /100 | #245 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Danes | 0.9 /100 | #246 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Hungarians | 0.8 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Poles | 0.7 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.0% |
| German Russians | 0.5 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 0.5 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 0.5 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.0% |
| British | 0.4 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Chinese | 0.4 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Swiss | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.1% |