Chickasaw vs Houma Female Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Houma
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Chickasaw
Houma
15.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Houma Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,688,443 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,798,615 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.902 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 11.1%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Houma |
| Minimum | 4.7% | 9.3% |
| Maximum | 45.6% | 47.8% |
| Range | 41.0% | 38.4% |
| Mean | 21.5% | 19.8% |
| Median | 19.7% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.4% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.3% | 21.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Houma by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Colville (15.1%, a difference of 0.95%), Dutch West Indian (15.0%, a difference of 1.4%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.4%), Tohono O'odham (15.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and Seminole (15.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Tsimshian (16.8%, a difference of 0.77%), Puerto Rican (16.6%, a difference of 1.7%), Kiowa (15.8%, a difference of 7.0%), Lumbee (15.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and Creek (15.7%, a difference of 7.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |