Chickasaw vs Houma Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,555,811 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and household income with householder between the ages 45 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.338 and weighted average of $82,193. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,775,541 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Houma and household income with householder between the ages 45 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.441 and weighted average of $72,093, a difference of 14.0%.

In terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Apache ($82,184, a difference of 0.010%), Yuman ($82,139, a difference of 0.070%), Choctaw ($82,287, a difference of 0.11%), Colville ($82,474, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Caribbean ($82,513, a difference of 0.39%).

In terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Pima ($73,365, a difference of 1.8%), Tohono O'odham ($73,774, a difference of 2.3%), Crow ($74,257, a difference of 3.0%), Navajo ($69,759, a difference of 3.4%), and Immigrants from Yemen ($74,575, a difference of 3.4%).