Alaskan Athabascan vs Yakama Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Yakama
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Yakama
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
296th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Yakama Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,819,153 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 6.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,759 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 6.8%, a difference of 1.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Yakama |
Minimum | 1.7% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 25.6% | 16.3% |
Range | 23.9% | 12.0% |
Mean | 8.7% | 8.5% |
Median | 7.4% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.3% | 9.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Yakama by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are French American Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Grenada (6.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Crow (6.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Cape Verdean (6.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and Puget Sound Salish (6.9%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Fijian (6.8%, a difference of 0.040%), U.S. Virgin Islander (6.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Jamaica (6.8%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Barbados (6.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and Nonimmigrants (6.9%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.8% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.8% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.9% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.9% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.9% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |