Alaskan Athabascan vs Australian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Australian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Australians
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
296th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Australian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,819,153 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 6.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,102,055 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 20.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Australian |
Minimum | 1.7% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 25.6% | 15.8% |
Range | 23.9% | 13.3% |
Mean | 8.7% | 6.9% |
Median | 7.4% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.3% | 7.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are French American Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Grenada (6.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Crow (6.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Cape Verdean (6.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and Puget Sound Salish (6.9%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.9% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.9% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.9% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |