British West Indian vs Yakama Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
British West Indian
Yakama
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
British West Indians
Yakama
7.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs Yakama Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,684,150 people shows no correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.033 and weighted average of 7.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,759 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 6.8%, a difference of 2.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | British West Indian | Yakama |
Minimum | 1.9% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 12.1% | 16.3% |
Range | 10.2% | 12.0% |
Mean | 6.8% | 8.5% |
Median | 6.8% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 9.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to British West Indians and Yakama by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Armenia (7.0%, a difference of 0.060%), African (7.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Marshallese (6.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Puget Sound Salish (6.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Grenada (6.9%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Fijian (6.8%, a difference of 0.040%), U.S. Virgin Islander (6.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Jamaica (6.8%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Barbados (6.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and Nonimmigrants (6.9%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.8% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.9% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.9% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.9% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |