Immigrants from Denmark vs Australian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Denmark
Australian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Denmark
Australians
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
93rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Denmark vs Australian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,424,948 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.340 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,102,055 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.18%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Denmark | Australian |
Minimum | 0.61% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 20.3% | 15.8% |
Range | 19.6% | 13.3% |
Mean | 7.2% | 6.9% |
Median | 5.7% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 7.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Denmark and Australians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Kenyan (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (5.8%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |