Iroquois vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,963,146 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 2.9 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $83,395, a difference of 12.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $96,834, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $52,365, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,104 compared to $39,870, a difference of 2.0%), median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $51,473, a difference of 4.3%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 22.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.89%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.1% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 13.0%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 0.57%), married-couple households (43.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.0%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 77.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 0.36%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 23.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.24%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 1.1%).