Hawaiian vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,525,179 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 31.4 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $60,748, a difference of 6.9%), median household income ($84,729 compared to $79,509, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $93,991, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($43,673 compared to $43,750, a difference of 0.18%), per capita income ($39,403 compared to $39,558, a difference of 0.39%), and median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $49,711, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 22.2%), receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 20.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 65.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 58.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 31.7%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 15.3%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.41 compared to 3.37, a difference of 1.0%), currently married (46.6% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 116.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 21.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 46.6%), associate's degree (40.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.10%), ged/equivalency (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 141.5%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.28%), female disability (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.74%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.0%).