Hawaiian vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,517,303 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.229. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 9.4 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($84,729 compared to $67,879, a difference of 24.8%), householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $52,081, a difference of 24.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $79,816, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($37,497 compared to $33,806, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $47,704, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 59.3%), family poverty (9.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 57.8%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 25.5%), single female poverty (21.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 33.3%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 33.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 44.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 41.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 29.4%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 21.6%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.41 compared to 3.45, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (67.4% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 30.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 20.2%), associate's degree (40.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 59.5%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 29.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 7.9%).