Brazilian vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,050,554 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to a decrease of 5.4 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,700 compared to $39,558, a difference of 18.0%), median male earnings ($56,837 compared to $49,711, a difference of 14.3%), and median family income ($106,942 compared to $95,573, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $54,000, a difference of 0.62%), householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $60,748, a difference of 1.2%), and median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $38,202, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 40.9%), single male poverty (11.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 31.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 4.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 58.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 57.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 57.2%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 26.0%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.2% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 67.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 36.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 0.33%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 44.2%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 44.1%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.38%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.70%), and 11th grade (92.8% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 102.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 54.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.1%).