Alaska Native vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,600,499 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.434. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.059% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to a decrease of 59.5 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,558 compared to $44,318, a difference of 12.0%), median male earnings ($49,711 compared to $53,680, a difference of 8.0%), and median household income ($79,509 compared to $84,691, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,202 compared to $39,228, a difference of 2.7%), householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $59,090, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $52,465, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 32.1%), single male poverty (15.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 29.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and female poverty (14.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 85.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 64.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 47.5%), births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 15.7%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.5% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 0.12%), married-couple households (45.6% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 54.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 30.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.8%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 33.7%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.37%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.99%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 141.6%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 61.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.83%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.1%).