Sierra Leonean vs Hungarian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Sierra Leonean
Hungarian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Sierra Leoneans
Hungarians
11.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
15.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
80.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sierra Leonean vs Hungarian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,300,875 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.116 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,786,573 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 10.9%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sierra Leonean | Hungarian |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.88% |
| Maximum | 20.4% | 62.3% |
| Range | 19.0% | 61.5% |
| Mean | 7.8% | 14.3% |
| Median | 7.3% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 12.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 13.2% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Sierra Leoneans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Somali (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Pennsylvania German (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Guatemalan (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Cambodians | 19.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 19.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 10.9% |
| Romanians | 17.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 10.9% |
| Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |
| Guatemalans | 16.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.0% |
| Somalis | 15.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.0% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 15.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.0% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 15.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.0% |
| Apache | 14.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.0% |
| Crow | 14.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 12.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Hungarians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |