Immigrants from Oceania vs Hungarian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Hungarian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Hungarians
9.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
80.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Hungarian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,786,769 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,786,573 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 1.9%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Hungarian |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.88% |
Maximum | 17.7% | 62.3% |
Range | 16.7% | 61.5% |
Mean | 9.3% | 14.3% |
Median | 9.4% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 18.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 13.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Hungarians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Syrian (9.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Kenyan (9.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from the Azores (9.7%, a difference of 0.37%), Burmese (9.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and Latvian (9.8%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |