Polish vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Polish
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Poles
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
8.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
82.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 555,400,436 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 8.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,693,810 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 16.8%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Polish | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 0.52% | 0.74% |
Maximum | 35.0% | 37.5% |
Range | 34.5% | 36.8% |
Mean | 7.6% | 7.2% |
Median | 6.4% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 8.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 6.1% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Poles by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Lithuanian (8.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (8.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Cajun (8.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Spaniard (8.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and Cuban (8.5%, a difference of 0.86%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Palestinians | 99.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Spaniards | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Cajuns | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |