Polish vs Immigrants from Canada No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Polish
Immigrants from Canada
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Poles
Immigrants from Canada
8.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Immigrants from Canada No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 555,400,436 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 8.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,526,846 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 3.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Polish | Immigrants from Canada |
Minimum | 0.52% | 0.85% |
Maximum | 35.0% | 21.0% |
Range | 34.5% | 20.1% |
Mean | 7.6% | 8.9% |
Median | 6.4% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Immigrants from Canada by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Lithuanian (8.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Cuban (8.5%, a difference of 0.86%), Jordanian (8.5%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and Iranian (8.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Canada are Immigrants from Germany (8.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bhutanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Cuba (8.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.57%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |