Jordanian vs Immigrants from Lithuania No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Jordanian
Immigrants from Lithuania
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Jordanians
Immigrants from Lithuania
8.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Immigrants from Lithuania No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,331,482 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,637,222 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.540 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 15.2%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Immigrants from Lithuania |
Minimum | 1.4% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 13.9% | 14.7% |
Range | 12.5% | 12.8% |
Mean | 6.1% | 5.3% |
Median | 5.8% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 6.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 2.9% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Cuban (8.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Iranian (8.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and Portuguese (8.6%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Spaniards | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Cajuns | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from South Africa (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |