Jordanian vs Immigrants from Cuba No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Jordanian
Immigrants from Cuba
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Jordanians
Immigrants from Cuba
8.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Immigrants from Cuba No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,331,482 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,235,999 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 2.1%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian | Immigrants from Cuba |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 13.9% | 25.3% |
| Range | 12.5% | 24.2% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 8.0% |
| Median | 5.8% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Immigrants from Cuba by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Cuban (8.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Iranian (8.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and Portuguese (8.6%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Bhutanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Germany (8.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Canada (8.7%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |