Iroquois vs Sierra Leonean No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Iroquois
Sierra Leonean
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Iroquois
Sierra Leoneans
10.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
17.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
15.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Sierra Leonean No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,994,531 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,300,875 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.116 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.44%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Sierra Leonean |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 20.4% |
Range | 98.5% | 19.0% |
Mean | 10.1% | 7.8% |
Median | 7.3% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 11.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.4% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.2% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Sierra Leoneans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Romanian (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Europe (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Guatemalan (11.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Chile (11.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and Somali (11.0%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Somali (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Pennsylvania German (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Guatemalan (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Brazil | 26.3 /100 | #195 | Fair 10.8% |
Central Americans | 24.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 10.8% |
Shoshone | 24.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 22.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 21.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 10.9% |
Cambodians | 19.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 10.9% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 19.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 10.9% |
Romanians | 17.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 10.9% |
Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |
Guatemalans | 16.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.0% |
Somalis | 15.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.0% |
Sierra Leoneans | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 15.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.0% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 15.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.0% |
Apache | 14.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.0% |
Crow | 14.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 12.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 11.1% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 12.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 11.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 10.6 /100 | #215 | Poor 11.2% |