Iroquois vs Immigrants from Brazil No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Iroquois
Immigrants from Brazil
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Iroquois
Immigrants from Brazil
10.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
17.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Brazil No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,994,531 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 341,931,543 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.209 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 1.7%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Immigrants from Brazil |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.95% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 35.7% |
Range | 98.5% | 34.7% |
Mean | 10.1% | 9.8% |
Median | 7.3% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 12.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.4% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.2% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Immigrants from Brazil by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Romanian (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Europe (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Guatemalan (11.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Chile (11.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and Somali (11.0%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Pueblo (10.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Ukrainian (10.7%, a difference of 0.29%), Central American (10.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Shoshone (10.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Sweden (10.8%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 36.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 34.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 10.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 33.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 10.7% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 32.1 /100 | #192 | Fair 10.7% |
Ukrainians | 28.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 10.7% |
Pueblo | 27.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 26.3 /100 | #195 | Fair 10.8% |
Central Americans | 24.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 10.8% |
Shoshone | 24.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 22.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 21.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 10.9% |
Cambodians | 19.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 10.9% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 19.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 10.9% |
Romanians | 17.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 10.9% |
Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |
Guatemalans | 16.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.0% |
Somalis | 15.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.0% |
Sierra Leoneans | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 15.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.0% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 15.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.0% |