Arapaho vs Yakama No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Arapaho
Yakama
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Arapaho
Yakama
7.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arapaho vs Yakama No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,758,955 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023 and weighted average of 7.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,905,065 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 6.6%, a difference of 11.2%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Arapaho | Yakama |
Minimum | 0.29% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 30.0% | 11.5% |
Range | 29.7% | 10.0% |
Mean | 8.7% | 5.4% |
Median | 7.3% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 6.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Arapaho and Yakama by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Ottawa (7.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Nepalese (7.4%, a difference of 0.57%), Irish (7.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Tongan (7.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and Welsh (7.2%, a difference of 2.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Danish (6.6%, a difference of 0.35%), German (6.7%, a difference of 0.99%), English (6.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Scottish (6.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and Norwegian (6.4%, a difference of 2.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.4% |
English | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Welsh | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Ottawa | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Nepalese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Irish | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.4% |