Arapaho vs Danish No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Arapaho
Danish
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Arapaho
Danes
7.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arapaho vs Danish No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,758,955 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023 and weighted average of 7.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,573,050 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125 and weighted average of 6.6%, a difference of 11.6%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Arapaho | Danish |
Minimum | 0.29% | 0.32% |
Maximum | 30.0% | 13.6% |
Range | 29.7% | 13.3% |
Mean | 8.7% | 4.0% |
Median | 7.3% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 5.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Arapaho and Danes by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Ottawa (7.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Nepalese (7.4%, a difference of 0.57%), Tongan (7.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Welsh (7.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and European (7.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Yakama (6.6%, a difference of 0.35%), English (6.5%, a difference of 1.2%), German (6.7%, a difference of 1.3%), Norwegian (6.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and Scottish (6.8%, a difference of 2.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.4% |
English | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Welsh | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Ottawa | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Nepalese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.4% |