Pima vs Yup'ik Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Pima
Yup'ik
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Pima
Yup'ik
9.3%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Yup'ik Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,489,621 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.416 and weighted average of 9.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,915,126 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.614 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 16.5%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Yup'ik |
| Minimum | 4.5% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 70.6% | 37.9% |
| Range | 66.1% | 34.9% |
| Mean | 19.4% | 14.0% |
| Median | 14.2% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.5% | 20.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.9% | 13.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.0% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.6% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Yup'ik by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yuman (9.6%, a difference of 2.8%), Arapaho (8.8%, a difference of 6.2%), Puerto Rican (8.3%, a difference of 11.9%), Inupiat (8.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and Hopi (8.1%, a difference of 15.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Crow (12.1%, a difference of 11.5%), Yuman (9.6%, a difference of 13.4%), Arapaho (8.8%, a difference of 23.7%), Puerto Rican (8.3%, a difference of 30.4%), and Inupiat (8.2%, a difference of 33.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 12.1% |