Pima vs Yup'ik Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Pima
Yup'ik
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Pima
Yup'ik
38.6%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
37.8%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Yup'ik Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,525,025 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.686 and weighted average of 38.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,932,947 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 37.8%, a difference of 2.0%.
Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Yup'ik |
Minimum | 19.4% | 16.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 80.6% | 83.1% |
Mean | 49.6% | 46.4% |
Median | 40.6% | 44.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 28.5% | 29.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.6% | 53.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 42.1% | 24.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.1% | 21.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.6% | 21.0% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Yup'ik by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Tohono O'odham (36.0%, a difference of 7.1%), Inupiat (34.5%, a difference of 11.8%), Navajo (33.3%, a difference of 15.8%), Pueblo (33.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and Tsimshian (32.9%, a difference of 17.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Tohono O'odham (36.0%, a difference of 5.0%), Inupiat (34.5%, a difference of 9.6%), Navajo (33.3%, a difference of 13.5%), Pueblo (33.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and Tsimshian (32.9%, a difference of 15.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 30.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 30.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 30.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 30.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 30.4% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 30.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 30.6% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 31.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 31.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 32.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 32.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 32.6% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 32.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 32.9% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 33.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 33.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 34.5% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 36.0% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 37.8% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 38.6% |