Hmong vs Immigrants from China Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
COMPARE
Hmong
Immigrants from China
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Comparison
Hmong
Immigrants from China
4.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
24.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hmong vs Immigrants from China Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,311,251 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.322 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 393,737,686 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.235 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 28.7%.
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hmong | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 0.80% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 14.0% | 14.3% |
Range | 13.2% | 12.4% |
Mean | 5.1% | 5.7% |
Median | 4.5% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 6.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 2.1% |
Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Demographics Similar to Hmong by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Chinese (4.4%, a difference of 5.7%), Fijian (4.5%, a difference of 7.3%), Tsimshian (4.6%, a difference of 8.9%), Sudanese (4.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and Immigrants from Cuba (4.6%, a difference of 9.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Comanche | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Denmark (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Cherokee (5.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Maltese (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Basque (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
Immigrants | Europe | 28.8 /100 | #188 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 28.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.4% |
Basques | 26.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 26.5 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.4% |
Maltese | 26.4 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.4% |
Cherokee | 25.8 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 24.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | China | 24.2 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
Costa Ricans | 21.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% |
Colville | 20.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% |
Albanians | 17.8 /100 | #198 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 16.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 15.2 /100 | #200 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 14.9 /100 | #201 | Poor 5.4% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 14.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 5.4% |