Hmong vs Chinese Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
COMPARE
Hmong
Chinese
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Comparison
Hmong
Chinese
4.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hmong vs Chinese Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,311,251 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.322 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,031,641 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 5.7%.
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hmong | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.80% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 14.0% | 13.1% |
Range | 13.2% | 12.1% |
Mean | 5.1% | 4.8% |
Median | 4.5% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 5.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Hmong and Chinese by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Fijian (4.5%, a difference of 7.3%), Tsimshian (4.6%, a difference of 8.9%), Sudanese (4.6%, a difference of 9.3%), Immigrants from Cuba (4.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and Indonesian (4.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Fijian (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Tsimshian (4.6%, a difference of 3.1%), Sudanese (4.6%, a difference of 3.5%), Immigrants from Cuba (4.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and Indonesian (4.7%, a difference of 5.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Comanche | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Kenyans | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Creek | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Menominee | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.8% |