Vietnamese vs Slovak Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Vietnamese
Slovak
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Vietnamese
Slovaks
19.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
75.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Vietnamese vs Slovak Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,480,173 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 387,555,709 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 22.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Vietnamese | Slovak |
Minimum | 0.61% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 51.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 51.2% | 96.0% |
Mean | 20.1% | 26.8% |
Median | 17.1% | 18.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.8% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.3% | 29.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.6% | 15.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 21.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 21.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Vietnamese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Vietnamese are Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Chickasaw (19.6%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.64%), Ottawa (19.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Demographics Similar to Slovaks by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slovaks are Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Colombian (15.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |